SOMEBODY HAS TO SAY IT

by Tommi Avicolli Mecca

Tommi Avicolli Mecca

Tommi Avicolli Mecca
Location
San Francisco, California, US
Birthday
July 25
Bio
I am a writer, performer and activist, editor of Smash the Church, Smash the State: the early years of gay liberation (City Lights), and co-editor of Avanti Popolo: Italian-American Writers Sail Beyond Columbus and Hey Paesan: Writings by Italian American Lesbians and Gay Men. To view my creative stuff: www.avicollimecca.com. youtube.com/user/avimecca. myspace.com/peacenikssf.

Tommi Avicolli Mecca's Links

My Links
Editor’s Pick
OCTOBER 24, 2011 9:30AM

Occupy the churches

Rate: 8 Flag

I find it very interesting that some liberal religious leaders have joined the ranks of Occupy Boston’s encampment, not to proselytize, they say, but to be a part of a movement that they see as naturally akin to their faiths. They’ve even set up a tent that is for religious services of all sorts and is considered sacred space. An ecumenical occupation, if you will. 

 

"There's so much polarization in our country now, and demonization of one side of the other. ... As religious leaders, we want to be 'repairers of the breach,'" Katherine Henderson of the Auburn Theological Seminary in New York told Yahoo News, quoting from the bible "So the question is how we can come together, Wall Street and Main Street, to come up with solutions that are going to work for all of us?"

 

Even though I am a staunch atheist, I have nothing against liberal religious leaders. It’s no surprise that they’d want to jump on board the Occupy Wall Street movement. The question is, can they get many of their comrades to follow?

 

Mainstream religion has not exactly been on the forefront of social change in this country. Except for a handful of liberal clergy (such as Daniel and Philip Berrigan), the churches have generally fought to retain the status quo. That was especially true during the major activist struggles of the past 40 years, including the civil rights, feminist, LGBT and anti-war movements, the Black Panthers, etc. 

 

Even during the height of the AIDS epidemic of the 80s, the number of liberal religious leaders who were out there in the streets with ACT UP and other activist groups were few and far between.

 

In the past decade, while Bush was decimating our civil rights via the Patriot Act, invading countries that are coincidentally rich in oil and profits for his corporate buddies, and laying the foundation for the foreclosure and unemployment crises of the Obama administration, liberal clergy weren’t on the front lines in great numbers. 

 

All of which has left a great vacuum that since the mid-70s has been filled by right-wing fundamentalists and TV evangelists, who live like the 1% and who oppose abortion, gay rights, taxing the rich, national healthcare, etc. Those folks can sure rev up the faithful to make a stink whenever some legislator talks of universal healthcare or, heaven forbid, gay marriage.

 

The addition of religious leaders to the Occupy Wall Street movement raises a question I’ve been thinking about ever since it all began a little over a month ago: how does a struggle that is composed of the 99%, a group as diverse as the country itself, remain unified with so many different agendas and so much difference in ideology and political and religious affiliation?

 

Can a common concern such as economic justice or taxing the rich really keep us together for the long struggle that’s ahead of us if we are to affect real change in this country? 

 

Stay tuned. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
The traditional liberal churches have a decent record in bringing congregants along and I hope they can, now. Excellent arguments here, friend. Rated.
I am drawn to writings concerning religion and politics having spent many years living in Utah where the LDS church exerts tremendous control of state politics. I cannot recall ever hearing about "liberal religious leaders" active in politics or publicly speaking out and galvanizing church members to support specific candidates. I am sincerely interested in this topic. Thought provoking, post. Rated.
Whenever I hear about a real "Big Tent" it brings out the Pantheist in me. Reasonable, good people, awash in tradition, who are OK with using Sermon on the Mount, or the Golden Rule itself equally and without fighting over whose Fairy Tale is paramount ... A western religious person who emulates what we know of the Jesus story via the New Testament is, indeed, Christ-like ... Joel Osteen and Friends? Not so much.

If they can bring their flocks into the fold then E Komo Mai, Welcome, brothers and sisters!!!

ps OWS SF Saturday was a beautiful thing to behold, not just religious leaders but the Police themselves marching, albeit as "escorts" lots of Aloha!
You would be wise to not only accept these leaders (and not be so high-minded about it) but get their help in leading this movement and help define what you are after. Because if you really think about it, who believed and preached more about social justice than Jesus Christ? He was the ultimate liberal! He told his disciples to give up all their possessions and preach about giving to the poor, caring for the sick, and loving your neighbor. He also stood up against injustice and stood up against the leaders oppressing the population. He as no wimp. He even let himself be hung out to die on a cross - that is how much He believed in His cause.

ALso, consider that there are CONSERVATIVES that also decry corporate greed and the concentration of wealth. I even think it is conservatives more than liberals who really want to restore the middle class. The irony of the OWS movement is that a lot of the people you bash - the CEO's and the bankers - are liberal!

So don't make this a liberal movement, or a "hippie" movement, etc... don't judge and don't discriminate.

And as far as promoting social justice, I cannot think of a better role model for the leaders of this movement than Jesus Christ.

May God Bless you!
I'm a Christian, and I too believe that Jesus's message was one of social justice, but unfortunately a lot of conservative Christians try to either gloss over that or ignore it completely. I wish the conservative Christians I know were on board with the message of OWS, but instead most of them are too busy ridiculing the movement instead of recognizing its worth.
Churches should be taxed. Period.
My problem with jesus (besides the fact that I don't think he ever lived, read "Nailed" by Patrick Jones or see "The god who never was") is that he has been used to oppress and slaughter so many people -- the inquisitions, the pogroms, the witch burnings, the crusades, the subjugation and murder of the natives peoples of this continent, etc. The history of christianity is not a pretty one. Hard to see much to admire in it all. My revolution is not about religion, it's about everyone having a fair share of the wealth and resources, it's about universal healthcare, affordable housing for all, living wage jobs, etc. If christians consider that part of their value system, that's cool. But it's not a christian revolution, it's a long overdue nonviolent revolution for social and economic justice for all in order to create a juster society. Everyone welcome to join.
Here is one of my contributions to the movement.... so far. Pass it along.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6xrMZwnS-o

Worth watching... subscribe if you like it.

http://www.youtube.com/user/MrParkerEast
The fact that Christian involvement in politics has been overwhelmingly conservative is telling. I suspect that Churches that exploit the Blue Book view of America are exploiting peoples fears and prejudices for monetary gain, nothing less. It's not about religion, even. It's about building fences, keeping people out, putting other people in their place. The more liberal leaning congregations have not been doing the same thing. Because it is a loathsome thing to do. But their involvement with OWS is not the same thing. The people at OWS need the ministry of our churches. The conservatives just want 'em all damned.
Here is one of my contributions to the movement.... so far. Pass it along.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6xrMZwnS-o

Worth watching... subscribe if you like it.

http://www.youtube.com/user/MrParkerEast
Tommi! This is a great piece of work. Congratulations on the EP. It is well deserved. This piece is full of all the right stuff, all the right arguments and the last line, well it says it all.
you and the editor are distracted and distracting from the declaration of the occupation (occupy wall street)

it doesn't matter
Unless we have arrived at the point where "mainstream" means Rick Warren and Pat Robertson and other conservatives, this is a remarkably ill-informed statement. Martin Luther King, a mainstream ordained minister, would be surprised to hear that the clergy and lay church members who took part in the Freedom Rides and went to jail during the civil rights movement were working to preserve the status quo. The United Church of Christ, which has been ordaining women since a century ago, and homosexuals since thirty years ago, and advocating same-sex marriage since five years ago, would be surprised to hear that it's been fighting the retain the status quo. The bishops of the Roman Catholic Church in the U.S. (whatever their position on matters related to sexuality and reproduction) have made powerful statements for decades about economic justice.

The list could go on, but it always comes down to the same thing: unless every self-identified Christian, not just a "handful," gets active in social movements, the church is regarded as anti-progressive. It may be flattering that so many people, especially "staunch atheists," have the expectation that members of a human institution can act in uniform integrity, but those members are aware of their sins and shortcomings, and they try to do their best, often on the front lines.
erosebud1's right. The church, and especially the black church, drove the Civil Rights movement. And the church was very important in the anti-war movement, way beyond the Berrigans. And the fact that conscientious objectors during Vietnam could choose alternative service rather than prison is because many Quakers, Mennonites and Amish went to prison during WWII because they refused induction into the military. They were such a pain in prison that the authorities decided to create another mode of service. And perhaps THE major source of draft counseling back then was the American Friends Service Committee, that is, Quakers.
"how does a struggle that is composed of the 99%, a group as diverse as the country itself, remain unified with so many different agendas and so much difference in ideology and political and religious affiliation?"

good question....and yet without the diversity, the appeal would be smaller. thanks for these thoughts....
also what I like best about occupy is the leaderlessness.....

this country has had enough false prophets....

it would be interesting if a lot of people were pulled to make things better in a similar direction....but without the usual apparatus of a political machine...

and my worry about occupy is that many of its participants may be too idealistic to vote.