..It's All About The Journey...

JULY 24, 2012 8:36PM

Can my Gay Community please stop whining about Sally Ride!

Rate: 29 Flag

For those in my gay community whining about all the good Sally Ride could have done had she only “come out;” I say – Get over yourself. 

For most gays and lesbians the hardest thing we will ever do in our lives is “come out.”  It’s personal, and absolutely no one can dictate to you the time, day, or moment you have to come out. It’s a scary straight world, full of hate, anger, bigotry, ignorance, and people who want to do nothing more than make a mockery of your life. It took me 50 years to find the strength and courage, so I totally understand my brothers and sisters who can’t find the strength and courage to step out from behind the curtain. It doesn’t mean their lives don’t matter, and it doesn’t mean we don’t support them in every way possible.

It’s not like she was hiding who she was or living in the closet.  She was with her partner for 27 years, I don’t know about you, but I’d call that a committed relationship. Her family was obviously well aware of her orientation, and quite supportive of her and her partner.  Why do you think she owed you any explanation about her life?

Could she have made a difference had she come out and been an advocate for the gay community? Perhaps, but why is it you think she owed anything to the gay community? Perhaps she didn’t want to be exploited as the “First Lesbian Astronaut,” and we all know that is exactly what would have happened. From all accounts, she was intensely private, and intensely private is not always something the gay community understands. We sometimes expect our famous gay and lesbian brothers and sisters to carry our banner to every corner of the world, shouting how we deserve and demand equal rights, when the reality is that they are simply trying to live a gay life in a straight world just as you and I are. I don’t believe we have the right to ask or demand that of anyone. 

She only could have made a huge difference if she would have been comfortable being the mouthpiece for the LGBT community. It’s hard enough sometimes to accept who you are without having to do it on a stage with millions of people scrutinizing every little thing you say and every little movement you make.  I don’t blame people for not wanting to come out – I wouldn’t want to be placed in that position, or held up to a certain standard that no matter what would never please everyone. And let’s be honest – people can be brutal in their assessment of who they think you should be. 

The truth of the matter is – being gay is not a choice we make, it’s simply who we are.  I would think that those of us who have been through, and continue to go through, the ups and downs of being out in a straight world would be a little more understanding. However, society, especially various portions of the religious part of it, doesn’t seem to want to accept that, so they have labels they place on everything and everyone to keep us all separate from one another. They simply cannot allow that we are all Americans.  We must be African-American, Mexican-American, Gay-American, Muslim-Americans, Jewish-Americans, Japanese-Americans, you fill-in-the-blank-Americans. Anything to keep us divided and keeps us in our place as “the other.”

Sally Ride lived a life of quiet dignity.  She did more to help young women find self-esteem, and believe in themselves that most of us will ever imagine doing in our lifetime. Have we stopped to consider that had she “come out” she may not have had that chance to teach and touch so many lives?  She would have been considered as one the ‘the other’ and certainly the money and the chances would not have been so forthcoming for her. Why can’t we let her have her life of quiet dignity?  Why can’t we just honor her for who she was and what she gave the world?

Instead of whining about Sally Ride, why don’t you go out in the world and make a difference? If you can change just one heart and one mind, you have changed the world just a little.  Write, talk, vote… Don’t expect someone to do it for you – go out and make the change you want to see…

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Damn, that was great. ~r
I agree. It seems like there is an expectation of someone "outing themselves" these days. The whole idea is that you CAN come out but that you don't have to. As you said, Ms. Ride lived her life the way she wanted and did it personally and privately. Isn't that what it's all about?
I stood my ground and came out.

It was a career killer.
oh... and yes, being able to help young women would have been very difficult.

I raised a powerful young woman, and her friends were "allowed" to come over, but it wasn't until their late teens that they could spend the night. This after knowing me and my partner for over 10 years.

My daughter was invited to a sleep over when she was 8. It was a birthday party and then sleep over. After the party part, I was asked to come and get my child. The mother explained "Oh we thought you knew Devon wouldn't be spending the night. It is you have have made that choice for her"
WHAT???

That is what Sally would have faced.

I am going to get flack from this, but truthfully, yesterday I read the piece on her and looked at her and thought out loud, wow a gay woman going into space that many years ago.

The people around me asked how I knew she was gay. So I went to look on the net and sure enough there it was, Thankl God! Because my only explaination is she looks gay, and she looks like my ex-partner.
"R'' To everything - turn, turn, turn....
For good or for bad, like it or not, big social change happens in increments. Dr. Ride was at the center of more than one. She got to choose how public to be about which ones.

And I agree that this was great.
According to what I've read, she didn't want to be a symbol of anything. She lived her life graciously, and I admire her for it. Great post.
I imagine she could have been an atheist, as well, for being a scientist. Whether she wanted to share that would be up to her, and the decision could have definitely marginalized her rather than open up more boundaries. I can't imagine Anderson Cooper's career could have been hurt by coming out recently, but this is a different generation and a different field.
Coming out is perhaps the most personal choice a person can make. But it is a luxury. Other minorities are not "unseen" as glbt folk can be, if they choose to remain invisible. You are correct, she did not owe it to anyone. But it would have been a powerful. It is just too bad, for whatever reason, she did not feel powerful enough to do so.
Well said. Coming out is a hard choice. I'm proud of my gay sisters and brothers that are out, and those that are still in the closet. We all make the choice we need to, and don't need each other's judgement, just support. Thanks for writing this.
Bravo! Friends were talking about this at lunch. I said, "Would I advocate marriage to a short, rotund, white guy just because I've had success in marriage?" We will be an inclusive society when there is no gay marriage only marriage. We will be an inclusive society when gay celebrities are just celebrities. Sally Ride was a great hero to many in my generation. I frankly don't give a rat's behind whether she was straight, gay or celebrate. She was the first American woman in Space. Hooray for Sally. I'm happy she loved someone for 27 years. Good for her. Barb, good for you for writing what you did. RRRRRR
Wonderfully expressed.
Yikes. "Quiet dignity." Your use of that phrase suggests that for Sally Ride to have come out of the closet would have been undignified.

I think that we of the gay and lesbian community need to examine ourselves closely for heterosexist beliefs that we have internalized. I mean, we don't expect heterosexual couples to keep their relationships hush-hush out of "quiet dignity," do we?

Anyway, I give Sally Ride a pass because she was born in 1951 and her career peaked in the homophobic 1980s (Ronald Reagan, AIDS hysteria, etc.).

And you are correct, of course, that it is up to the individual to decide whether or not to come out, since it is the individual who will have to deal with the consequences of that.

For anyone who is in the limelight to stay in the closet today, though -- that, to me, pretty much is a crime.

To stay in the closet when one could be out is to reinforce homophobia.

It's a shitty job, but we gay men and lesbians DO have the responsibility of helping to change the world, to help make things better for others today and tomorrow.

"Quiet dignity" -- or fear-based selfishness?
I've never loved you more....

It was never an issue of her hiding her life, it was just a matter of her not making it a topic of discussion. She found her life love just 2 years after her first flight in space. She was an important part of the Challenger investigation and a huge influence on girls interested in science, all while being openly gay but not PUBLICLY gay....there is a difference and I appreciate you recognizing it.

I don't actually spend much of my day saying "oh, by the way, I'm straight" so I sort of wonder why it's assumed that gay people will just broadcast that they are gay.
Excellent post, Barbara. I totally believe that sexuality, wherever we fall in the spectrum, is determined biologically. So, to a great extent are our personalities, whether we're comfortable in the limelight...or not. Attitudes have changed greatly if slowly in the last decade alone. But not everyone wants to be chased around by paparazzi or be photographed whenever they go out in public, regardless of their sexual orientation, and that's even before you factor in the scary, ugly hatred that still exists in this nation.

Is every gay person who makes a significant public achievement such as being the first woman in space, being a Nobel Laureate or winning an Olympic medal REQUIRED to also be a public spokesperson even if every other aspect of their personality would turn that prospect into a terrible burden? I don't think so, myself. There are less public ways to still be a force for good in the world.

rated
nicely said. I keep wondering why your community doesn't get behind Bradley Manning? I consider him a profound hero! best, libby
Terrific. So well-argued.

Rated.
Reasonable, passionate, eloquent.
Yup. And let's not forget who Sally worked for. Choice still belongs to the self! tg Thanks B.
Well said. I respect her right to come out, or not come out, in the way that was comfortable for her.
I think what you forget, Barbara, is that it was people coming out for the past four or five decades that has made this country a much safer place for queers, it was the sacrifice of individuals such as Harvey Milk and so many others who turned the invisible into the visible, and who challenged the belief that there was something shameful, sinful and sick about being queer. I came out 42 years ago, I got kicked out of my house, I got fagbashed several times, I watched so many friends die while the government and the country didn't give a damn. I have seen massive changes in people's attitudes, BECAUSE WE CAME OUT and showed the world who we were. Sure, Sally Ride had a right to make her own choices, but it is disappointing as hell to me that someone in her position chose not to say to the world, "Look, I have achieved all this for women--and I am a lesbian." How much richer we all are for having great comedians like Lily Tomlin and Ellen DeGeneres out of the closet and role models for young lesbians (and gay men and transgender people), showing them that you can be out and successful in show business. And look, Ellen even got a major corporation hiring her as spokesperson. Sally Ride didn't have to go on marches, just her simply declaration of being a lesbian or maybe of putting her name to some causes, such as the anti-bullying campaign (since she cared about kids) would have gone a long way. We still need people to be courageous and to come out, especially those with high visibility. What if Harvey Milk had said, "Oh, I don't need to come out, my private life is no one's business." I will fight (and have fought many many years) for anyone's right to be in or out of the closet, but don't ask me to like their choice not to contribute to the struggle. We used to say in the old days that if every queer person were to turn lavender overnight, people's attitudes would change in a hurry. It's still true. Our invisibility allows the hypocritical politicians to have a wife and kids and sneak off with the male hustler. It allows the preacher who preaches against gay marriage to lead his double life. It allows all the women still trapped in straight marriages to keep denying their lesbian selves. It allows people to assume that all scientists and astronauts are straight. I'm proud to be out for 42 years, even if it has killed opportunities for me (I get what you're saying, Dianne) because being in a closet is stifling. Straight people don't have to announce their sexuality because it is assumed that everything is straight until proven otherwise. Coming out is still the way to help change the world. Sally Ride did great things, but coming out posthumously was not one of them.
@ Joan – Thanks so much…
@ Walter – Yes, that is what it’s all about! Thanks for reading and for the comment
@ Dianne – I’m proud of you for standing your ground – I’m sorry people still don’t understand. Thanks for reading and for the comment.
@ SpiritManSF – Turn, turn, turn indeed! Thanks so much…
@ nerd cred – Thanks so much – for reading and for the comment
@ sweetfeet – I admire her also – Thanks for reading and taking the time to comment.
@ Oryoki – This is indeed a different generation. Thanks for reading and for the comment.
@ Kirk – I think if you asked the girls she inspired you might get a different sense of her power. She didn’t really owe any of us a thing… Thanks for reading…
@ Kevin – Thank you for reading and for the comment.
@ Bernadine – …”We will be an inclusive society when there is no gay marriage only marriage. We will be an inclusive society when gay celebrities are just celebrities…” Exactly.! Thanks so much for reading and for the comment.
@ Lynette – Thanks so much – for reading and taking the time to comment
@ Robert – I’m sticking with “quiet dignity.” I’m also sticking with my feelings that absolutely no one has the right to tell another person they have to come out – “limelight” or not – you don’t have the right to insist they come out. They owe you nothing. It’s their choice, just like it was yours and mine. We all change the world in the ways that we can. You can call it whatever you chose – I will call it “quiet dignity.”
@ Ellen – I love you back.! Thanks for always reading and always taking the time to comment.
@ Shiral - “There are less public ways to still be a force for good in the world.” - this is my point exactly! Thanks for reading and taking the time to comment..
@ libby – I wonder the same thing.. thanks so much for reading and for taking the time to comment.
@ Jonathan - ♥♥ Thanks so much..
@ Chicken – Thanks so much…
@ Tg – Thank you – for reading and for taking the time to comment.
@ Sophieh – Thanks so much.
@ jlsathre – Exactly – It was her life – it didn’t belong to the gay community… Thanks for reading and for the comment.
Isn't it enough that she conquered space for women?
@ Tommy – I’m not forgetting anything Tommy – I’m not saying that those who had the courage to come out 40 or 50 years ago didn’t start the change we see today in motion.
What I’m saying is – you don’t have the right to expect people to come out, for not everyone has the courage or the support to do so. I certainly didn’t, and I don’t believe I should be berated for not having that courage.
You can be disappointed, and you can not like their choices, I just don’t believe you have the right to demand that every celebrity or every gay, lesbian and transgendered person must come out and fight for the cause. Not all of us have that sort of courage and strength. That’s when it falls on the rest of the community to be there.
People will assume whatever they want whether we are out or not. Politicians will be hypocritical no matter what, and Evangelical Christians will fight against us – no matter what.
I don’t believe you have to come out in a public way to change the world. I believe you can do that by living your life quietly being out and showing friends and neighbors and co-workers that we’re just normal people trying to make our way in the world. If you change one heart and mind you have changed the world, and we can each do that in our own way – on our own terms.
We want the same thing – you and I – we just see it through different eyes. I’m uncomfortable with the shouting and demanding aspect of it – I’m more a throw a block party and have the neighbors see a happy, committed Lesbian couple quietly living their lives out and proud. I know for a fact that Susan and I have changed hearts and minds, and isn’t that really what it’s all about?
@ Miguela – It’s certainly enough for me… Thanks for reading and for the comment.
She inspired many young people and will continue to do so for her work in science and her advocacy for education.
Critics, not so much.
the first lesbian astronaut was the russian one, i thought.

they can't come out at all over there, though
@ alsoknownas – “…Critics, not so much..” How true is that… thanks for reading and for the comment.
@ Baltimore oreo – You are right about the Russian women being first in space and not being able to come out. The United States lagged in the women in space thing…! Thanks for reading and for the comment.
I agree. It is a personal decision for a gay or lesbian person to "come out". She would never have made it as far as she did if she had made her orientation an issue. Anderson Cooper just came out and that was also up to him, even though most of us knew that he is gay.

Sally Ride was a heroine and role model for all women and girls. I don't want her accomplishments to be so wrapped up in her sexual orientation that she is not recognized for making progress for all of us.
Very well said! We need to be known by who we are, not by our roles/labels/ demographics. It's absolutely okay that Sally did not publicize her sexuality to the same extent as others, and it does not diminish her contributions. Coming out is intensely private, and privacy is not a selfish act. Sally had no responsibility to share anything she didn't want to share, anymore than anyone else does. It's okay that others feel inclined to share more than she did, and it's okay that she shared less. Your essay is succinct and very well written. Thanks!
This is excellent -- SO EXCELLENT!!!

Thank you for writing it.

Rated!!!!!!

Andrea
I personally think it is just as important and valuable to society at large that there are those in the LGBT community who choose not to be outspokenly political or loud in the public forum about their sexuality. Like every other group, it is smart to realize not everyone in said group is the same and who knows what advances are being made right this minute by Sally Ride's choice of being more private?
Meaning, and I hesitate here as how does one say this correctly?
...how many possibly closed minds might be learning now that this woman was a lesbian -- she wasn't political, she didn't wave a banner or lead parades, she just achieved success and lived a good life -- and are also learning by her example that many in the LGBT community don't care if the community at large knows their sexuality, many choose to live quietly without loudspeakers, many are not in parades or are political or are strident.
Just like many in every other group.
I think her example is there in her own way.
Just like Christians, Whites, Republicans, Muslims, Southerners, Asians, Singers, Pick-A-Group-Title, not all in the LGBT community are the same.
I hate to say, but I know there are some in the straight community whose biggest issue with the "gay movement" IS the loudness, IS the in-your-face attitude, IS the political earnestness, more than it is with their sexuality in general -- there are many who assume that that is what it means to be gay, not realizing how large a segment is gay yet isn't interested in loud or political.
I fully support it all, as in-your-face has a necessary point, has been crucial in certain times, will be crucial in the future,but....
What seems to be lost among certain segments of straights, some I've met, is there is diversity in the LGT community too -- I've met, and heard of, those who don't get that not every gay person is loud, is political, is extroverted, for that matter. I've been in arguments with some of those straight folks, they really think all gay men like to flamenco and wear makeup and stilettos, that all lesbians wear toolbelts as much as possible and have short grey hair and glasses, that all LGBTs are strident and pissed off.
Ai yi yi !!!

I personally think Sally Ride had just as important and valuable a statement to make too, one made just by living privately the way she chose rather than stating it loudly to all.
@Tommy: I hear you and appreciate your points, but this sentence is just a huge assumption that isn't necessarily true:
"Straight people don't have to announce their sexuality because it is assumed that everything is straight until proven otherwise. "
There are plenty who assume someone else is gay until proven otherwise as well...
Every straight person I know assumed Jody Foster, Lily Tomlin and Anderson Cooper, Rock Hudson and Rachel Maddow, for that matter, were gay, way before the "proof."
-- just the more famous examples.
@Barbara: I'm not demanding that every celebrity do what I did or what Del Martin or Lily Tomlin did. I just think that it's sad when a person who is in a position to help his or her community doesn't take advantage of it. That's why I admire Lily Tomlin so much. She didn't have to come out. Neither did Ellen DeGeneres, but they did and they made a huge difference in how the world looks at lesbians. Ellen is spokesperson for JC Penny! And an out lesbian who is reaching so many people on TV and I'm sure changing so many attitudes, just by being herself. That was our vision in gay liberation in the early 70s, that queers would come out and just by being ourselves, we would change attitudes. I understand that you are doing that on a smaller scale. But, honestly, we need folks like Ellen and Lily who can do them on a larger scale. And in many different arenas, even at NASA. Straights don't have to come out because everyone assumes everyone else is straight so straights have the luxury of simply living without explaining anything. It's different for people outside the "norm." I'm not condemning Sally Ride or diminishing her accomplishments. I know that not everyone can be a damn rowdy loudmouth like I am...I honestly feel that this has been a great discussion, on all three pages (yours, mine and Robert Crook's). I thank everyone for being part of it. As a community, we need to have more of these types of discussions. I hope we can all agree to disagree and understand that we are part of the same struggle.
@Just Thinking: I don't know of any straight people who have had to come out because straight is the "norm," straight people are not in the closet. Besides, I knew folks who argued with me when I said Lily Tomlin was lesbian, until, of course, she came out. Ditto for the others you mentioned. Hell, in the 80s, people were shocked to learn that Rock Hudson was gay. I wasn't. But then, I have gaydar. LOL
@Just Thinking: And as for those straights and queers who don't like the loudness and in-your-face nature of our movement -- Harvey Milk was as loud and in-your-face as could be and now he's a Hollywood star. If we had not been in your face during the 70s, shrinks would still be doing aversion therapy on gay men (strapping electrodes to their dicks and shooting them with electricity to make them "straight"), there would be no gay marriage or gays in the military, Sally Ride would not have been able to mention her wife in her obit. If we hadn't been loud and in your face in ACT UP, AIDS would be killing tons more people. We forced this country to deal with AIDS as a disease and not a judgement on a lifestyle. Check out the documentary VITO which I have a small appearance in. Vito Russo was a loud and in-your-face AIDS activist. We had to be. Those who condemn the loud and in-your-face nature of our movement are clueless, they need to go read about what things were like in this country when gay bars were routinely raided and the names, addresses and employers of those arrested published in the newspapers the next day. I am proud to be a loud and in-your-face activist.
Tommy, sorry to take so long getting back here, just noticed your comment --
My comment about "loud and in your face" :
I was meaning to refer to the positive influence that a more quiet choice of lifestyle in the gay community can also have, such as Sally Ride's, in bringing about change in the general society of ours.
It just is a fact that we humans respond differently, and I feel, actually I know that, some straight people I know have come around to supporting equal rights for the gay community through appreciation of those more quiet examples of lifestyle in the gay community while they were more adamantly against the gay lifestyle when they falsely assumed that loud-and-in-your-face *was* the only type that is gay.
This discussion has occurred in the environmental movement too -- some will be loud and in-your-face, and just as rightly so as being an in-your-face activist is in the gay community.

Many that you are trying to reach, many that environmentalists are trying to reach, just will not respond positively to that method of activism.

I only meant to say I think that positive influence can be extended farther when a group is seen to be diverse itself, as the gay community is -- who knows who came around to supporting gay rights because "that amazing Sally Ride achieved so much and she just quietly lived her life the way she wanted -- I admire that, maybe I need to consider that not all gays are marching in the streets. Those types I don't like and I won't support anything those flashy protesters do."
I somewhat cringe in inventing that person's thoughts, but those people are out there -- I've met many -- and they damn well fought against the gay pride movement when they thought it was all single men marching in the streets.

I began to type further about my own background, but I think it is its own post instead -- suffice to say here, my sister was an activist-oriented lesbian in the 70s in Atlanta, Georgia.
I adore her.
I get the intensity.
It's your frickin' Life on the line.
I get it.

I never meant to suggest that in-your-face is wrong, it's how necessary change begins, in many ways, and it was and is necessary.
I truly do not think it is the *only* way to get the positive message out at this point, that's all. That's why I think Sally Ride's life is a valuable contribution to gay rights too, just the way she lived it.

As for Lily Tomlin, I had that very argument in the late 70s -- with my sister. I was *convinced* Ms. Tomlin must be gay (my sister loved to peg who was famous and who was secretly gay in those days, so I loved to do the same thing) but my sister didn't think so...at first.
I used to tease her that my 'gaydar' was better than hers, although at the time, gaydar wasn't the word used...
By the way, I *am* a straight person -- if my thoughts are offensive, I apologize to anyone out there reading this.
I just want the conversation to keep happening, so I willingly blundered into making the first comment to make this point from a straight person who supports gay rights with a vehemence -- and has seen too much suffering and discrimination too, including 'good' families disowning their children, even, in some cases, their dying grown children.
Hideous!
As you know.

The only reason I brought in environmental groups into the second comment is the intensity with which many feel in-your-face activism is the only way to save the planet from certain destruction, while others feel that very method has turned too many away from the environmental cause and inadvertently made it worse-- that a diversity of approach with their activism is more broad and successful.
These people, whatever the method they believe in, feel their life, all our lives, are on the line too, albeit differently, so I included them into the comment.