SENSE and SENSITIVITIES

Making Epistemological Sense Out of Existential Madness

Alan Milner

Alan Milner
Location
Florida, USA
Birthday
October 12
Title
Senior Mortgage Analyst
Company
RESMAC
Bio
Brooklyn-born, graduate of Brooklyn Technical High School and City College of New York. Background includes advertising, public relations, journalism, marketing, organizational development and fund raising and, for the past 15 years, mortgage banking. You can still find my poetry at sagemerlin.

MY RECENT POSTS

Alan Milner's Links

Salon.com
NOVEMBER 2, 2010 11:21AM

Mail-In Voting: A Cure For What Ails Us?

Rate: 5 Flag

Normally, Iwould have posted this as a comment on Just Thinking's post but, given the dozen or so spam comments on that page, I figured that no one would ever find it there.

 

Just Thinking's piece about mail-in voting in Oregon got me thinking.

Her report about how Oregon...which had an 85% voter turn-out in 2008.... did away with the election day polling process in favor of a mail-in only system back in 1998 made me realize that we're all idiots.

We stand in line, sometimes for hours, in all kinds of weather, to exercise our franchise, and congratulate ourselves for having done our civic duty, when all we've really done is to contribute to the election day rituals that create much heat but little light.

The media loves it, because it gives them cheap shots of voters standing in line and waiting for their turn to vote, with the occasional voter machine snafus to add some additional spice to their coverage.

The pollsters love it because it gives them another chance to interview voters to determine in advance what will soon be determined by the voters

Like I said, we're idiots.

We're merely unpaid extras, window dressing for the head shots of the talkimg heads blathering platitudes about an election that is still in process.

We're idiots because every single one of us has the option of voting by mail...just like Oregon does...right now, and have had that ability for years.

It's called the absentee voter system, and it's available to every one of us.

In 2008, it took me three hours to cast my ballot.  It was a typically hot South Florida day, and the senior citizens were out in force, braving the heat to cast their votes.  

At the time, I felt good about myself for making the effort to vote...but, now, I realize that I was just another idiot on the idiot line.

This year, remembering that ordeal, we decided to take advantage of Florida's early voting process.  It took us 40 minutes to exercise our franchise this way, which is a lot better than three hours, but it only took me five minutes to drop off my mother's absentee ballot at the Election Commission office in Delray Beach.  It wouldn't have taken me even that long if I had actually  mailed the ballot on time...but it would have cost me $1.22 to mail the oversized envelope.

Logic suggests that early voters are probably more ideologically committed  to one party or the other, while the procrastinators are more likely to be people who are still on the fence, unable to make a decision on one or more offices, and waiting for some inspiration to strike.

Casting votes is one thing.  Counting them is quite another.

Some commentators have suggested that we need to computerize the voting process to allow citizens to vote from their home computers.  Others have suggested dial-in voting, ATM voting, and other, even more bizarre composites...but there's really no substitute for an actual paper ballot on which voters actually write their choices.

Some years ago, the separate states started experimenting with various computerized polling systems, each of which had the same drawback:  they aren't tamper-proof.  Some used punch cards...with the unfortunate results that gave us the first contested presidential election in American history.  Others used touch screens, which turned out to be even less reliable than the notorious punch cards.

There's just no substitute for a paper and ink ballot system, which gives election officials a paper trail to verify the results the computers give us.

Palm Beach County now uses a very efficient polling system in which paper ballots are marked and fed through an optical character reader that compiles the votes.  The collection of paper ballots provides an important check and balance against computer gliches and outright machine tampering frauds. 

The Florida absentee-voting system uses the same exact paper ballots, which can be mailed or dropped off at local Election Commission offices. 

The Pew Foundation just released a survey indicating that 23% of the votes cast this year were cast during the early voting process, which includes absentee ballots.

That trend is likely to continue as more and more Americans realize that, the sooner you vote, the sooner those annoying robotic phone calls will end. 

We now have a mechanism for evaluating the intelligence of the American voter.

I have no way of proving this, but I think that early voters are smarter voters.

Maybe their votes should count twice.

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I agree. I know exactly who I am voting for a long time before election day. I just hope the system in Minnesota doesn't take as long as the last election when it took us several months to count the ballots for the senate race.
rated
That voting twice thing was tried many times. When I was a kid in south Louisiana, my uncles and grandfather would come from voting laughing their heads off. They were giving out bottles of Hadacol at the polling places (100 alcohol cough syrup) and you can bet many people went back for a second vote!!
You may be right. The people that mail in their ballots have to at least look up a few facts, which I don't think over 75% of the voters do. In 2012, I going to start a movement. I going to tell people that whenever someone asked them who they are going to vote for, tell them the opposite. If everyone did this, those asswipe talking-heads world look dumber than they really are!
Spammers only were winning overnight, the spammers are gone now...but nice tactic.... : )
"but there's really no substitute for an actual paper ballot on which voters actually write their choices"

Got to love the feeling of drawing the line on a paper ballot!!! Oh my yes!!

Rated!!!
I am really concerned that the talking heads out there are going to talk us into computerizing the ballots. There's no substitute for scanning and tabulating the votes from paper ballots....it's more accurate and quite difficult to introduce interpolations in the data....because you have the paper votes to back up the vote totals from the machines. But we don't want to wait four months to count and recount the ballots by hand.

I am with Scanner on the idea of lying to pollsters. More than that, let's ban the pollsters. They distort the facts.
I can see it now. It will be like the new NPR fund-raisers, telling us that there's a way to avoid future invasive fundraisers if we only act definitively now. “Vote now to win this fine mug autographed by Michael Dukakis or vote twice now and win a bottle of domestic wine or become a sustaining voter by committing all your future votes to our party today and we'll send you and your s.o. tickets for dinner at the Boston Pops.”
I have permanent mail in status. I move alot so it just makes sense. Everyone should have a mail in ballot. You can take you time and look up information. It makes sense and there is a paper trail. Why can't we all figure this out?!
In this age of "do it now," we tend to forget how we elected candidates early on. At the dawn of the US, the citizens were allowed to create their own ballot, simply by writing down, on any handy piece of paper, who they wanted for each office. They then took this simple device to the local election officials.

Granted, the country is considerably larger than before, but your post shows that often the simplest ideas have the most merit.

As far as the "need" to computerize, I'm sure Tink would agree that it's easy to program a computer to produce any output desired, regardless of information entered. (Being a former computer-science major in college, tell me the OS and programming language, give me sufficient time, and I could probably do it myself so you wouldn't even realize what happened.) That's why some kind of paper trail is absolutely vital.
Alan, a couple of states tried electronic only voting and the Supreme Court ruled that it can't be done completely electronically due to the fact that without a paper ballot you cannot perform either a recount or a retabulation. Electronic Poll Books are in some states (your driver's license number and your voter identification are the same number) but the ballots themselves MUST be paper to allow recounts and retabulations to be done.

As for mail in voting only... it is typically more expensive to do mail in only voting but it is more convenient for voters so to my way of thinking it is probably a better choice than the current scheme.