There’s a movie out now called Like Crazy and it’s about the effects of distance on a romantic relationship. As I’ve had more of the long distance variety than I might have wished for, I was curious. Then I got a strong recommendation from Hayley, with whom I had an eleven year romance where only three of them were spent in the same city. I double checked against Rotten Tomatoes. Not bad – low to high 70s.
All the movie’s principals – director Drake Doremus and lead actors Felicity Jones and Anthon Yelchin were unknown to me. The promotion budget was whatever it costs to run off one poster per cinema. But it’s an engaging enough story.
A couple, Jacob and Anna, fall for one another in college. Both actors are a little underplayed and the movie doesn’t go for big, obvious lines or gags. Much of the dialogue was improvised by the actors, as it was in the marvellous Before Sunset. But the romance is plausible and both characters are likeable. She’s British and overstays her visa because she can’t bear to part with him just yet. When she returns to the UK, the overstayed visa prevents re-entry to the U.S. She tries once but is turned back at the LA airport. This established the distance.
The coping part is handled pretty well. Your life goes on but you don’t feel fully engaged. There’s a phone call to be made or received, a letter (email these days) to compose and the general sense that whatever outing you’re on would be life-meaningfully enhanced if your love were with you. While you try not to acknowledge it, you’re worried that your love will be swept of their feet by someone new; maybe a little more charming than oneself but definitely more available.
At home you’re out with your friends when it dawns on you that part of the early 20s social scene is the expectation, hope or off-chance that you’ll hook up with someone. But now you’re not interested; flirting is as far as you’ll take it, and some nights you find the wingman role uninteresting.
Your plans revolve around weekend trips or vacations to see the other. Finally they come but much as you want to see one another, there’s always a readjustment, some unnatural catching up, and reacclimization. Idle, relaxing time is at a high premium so it gets short shrift. Which doesn’t help because those languorous, aimless hours flesh out any relationship. Sort of like how dark matter has to exist because the universe would be impossible without it. On the other hand you go out a lot, it’s a whirlwind of activity and the sex is more than usually exuberant.
Then there’s the anxious days or hours before the trip back home. And the airport. The ride there is tense because you’re rechecking your passport, your ticket and wondering what you might have forgotten. Then it’s the inadequate parting, the realization that it’s way too much time till the next visit, followed by the disoriented, lonely trip back from the airport. Invariably you find yourself seated near an excited couple who’ve just reunited.
You face the recurring questions. How long till we’re permanently in the same city? Who would have to move and who, in terms of job, family, friends, cultural familiarity, gives up what? Does winding up in the same city imply marriage? Is it a pre-condition? Is this really the right person for the long term or just a good, open-ended relationship? Might I overly procrastinate and risk losing him or her to someone else?
Most of the above themes were covered in Like Crazy. They certainly were in my own life. In an ultimately unsuccessful relationship there’s never just one problem. But a big one in Hayley’s and mine was the non-agreement on who should follow whose career. The outcome was that neither was inclined to be the follower. And if I were the type given to wallowing regrets about roads not taken, I have the material for it. Happily, I’m too superficial for that.


Salon.com
Comments
:D
Seriously, me and wifey did the long distance relationship, me in Butte, Montana, her here in New Albany, Indiana, the phone bills were terrible(*now that we got anywhere long distance calling program, NOBODY TO CALL!!! :D)
Trying to explain how the dating and/or 'other parts of unmentionable things of relationship' worked to folks who most the time have their loves in the same city, is tough.
It can be done but it is work, which is why a lot of them go poof after awhile.
RATED!!
I hope...
:D
I'd forgotten about those monstrous phone bills. Back in the 80s there were no phone cards and I've no doubt a few of those 1%ers bought yachts thanks to me.
The movie is low-key but enjoyable enough. You might want to check out Rotten Tomatoes and see what you favorite critic(s) have to say.
It's a drug! Just say no!
On the other hand—and I have not seen the film of course—you were certainly not superficial in you analysis of the components of one of these deals. I swear, everyone's experience of this is exactly the same.
Lezlie
Sounds like the observations of someone who is both introspective and has done more than a little self-analysis. You don't necessarily have to be searing and emotional to uncover truths about yourself and your experiences. And wallowing in regret, unless it leads to growth or discovery, is just wallowing. It gets old, too.
I've never had a long-distance relationship but I can easily see how not having that day to day time could kill it. I knew a woman whose husband's job required him to be out of the country for most of the year. She said when he was home, she and her daughters had gotten into such a routine that he was more like a guest and sometimes an irritating, inconvenient one at that. They'd lived this way for over ten years and it sounded awful.
Thanks for the movie recommendation and great version of this song.
Lezlie – maybe they’re in a bad relationship where the distance factor is appealing. But if you’re really fond of the other, it’s bad.
Count your blessings Various. You’re right that the day-to-day trivia can really add, not just to a relationship, but with your whole outlook on life.
Margaret – thanks for the comment. I guess I’m lucky in having a bit of that Don’t Look Back strand of DNA. At least not to the extent of stewing. That woman you know sounds like a lot of wives after WW2 who had trouble coping with their hubbies after a few years of absence. Or retired couples who hadn’t reckoned on so much company.
The TUIB version is from the Rolling Thunder tour. There used to be many numbers on YouTube but about a year ago almost everything of Dylan's was taken down. A highlight was a rollicking version of Isis.
Rodney – had I followed Hayley’s career, I’d be living in Berkeley now. Not too bad an outcome. But when the crucial moment arose I couldn’t resist a few years working in Europe.
My longest distance relationship was a grand total of around 100 miles. It collapsed within a couple months.
Stim – yes, Felicity is pretty but not in the overly Hollywood sense. And 100 miles still means it’s a weekend relationship at best. Even that is tough to sustain, as you say.
Bell – you might want to check out a couple of critics on Rotten Tomatoes. Mick LaSalle of the San Francisco Chronicle has a very positive, insightful one. As I mentioned to Brass, superficial may not be the best word. I was looking for something like an antonym for introspective.